we keep the lower end of the 5.4 reserved for local PTP, we crank the power down and point to the ground if need be
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > 0% chance of interfering with the radio a foot away. In the event you > need to change bands or the installer sets the same band. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yeah, I'm not sure why you would ever use 2.4ghz, if you don't have to. >> Much better to just use a different part of the 5ghz band, in my opinion... >> this sort of thing is usually a perfect fit for the DFS band. >> >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> 20 MHz * 4 bits perfect would be 80 megs....best case scenario. >>> >>> If you need to carry 100 megs, do a Force 180 in DFS with 40 MHz >>> channels. You can have a shop guy program a bunch of pairs/do a backup >>> ready to go for the installers. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:45 AM, David Coudron < >>> david.coud...@advantenon.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Right, our thought process was run the APs in the 5GHz band and use the >>>> Nanostation 2s. That has seemed to work well, but just wondering if >>>> anyone else had another suggestion. Sounds like we will stay with this. >>>> We typically run the fattest channel we can on these relay radios. We >>>> will eventually be offering 100 Mbps plans, not sure if the Nanostations >>>> will be able to do this. We will be testing that out this week. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *David Coudron* >>>> >>>> david.coud...@advantenon.com | *Mobile: *612-991-7474 >>>> <(612)%20991-7474> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Advantenon, Inc. * [image: >>>> cid:image001.png@01CEE562.60FF8FC0] >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/Advantenon> [image: >>>> cid:image002.png@01CEE562.60FF8FC0] <http://www.twitter.com/Advantenon> >>>> [image: cid:image003.png@01CEE562.60FF8FC0] >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/Advantenon> [image: >>>> cid:image004.png@01CEE562.60FF8FC0] <http://blog.advantenon.com/> >>>> >>>> i...@advantenon.com | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN >>>> 55447 | www.advantenon.com | *Phone:* 800-704-4720 >>>> <(800)%20704-4720> | *Local: *612-454-1545 <(612)%20454-1545> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:43 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force110 vs Force200 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> For those barn to house PTP links we've been doing Nanostations. We >>>> use a different band than the rx radio for the Internet service (ie >>>> Force200 for Internet, nsm2 ptp link). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists < >>>> jeffl...@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> What size channel? >>>> >>>> Jeff Broadwick >>>> >>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office >>>> >>>> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell >>>> >>>> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:51 PM, David Coudron < >>>> david.coud...@advantenon.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> We have what I believe is a similar need. We have a number of >>>> customers that have large farmyards and want coverage in outbuildings. >>>> These are too far for ethernet runs, so we have been using Ubiquiti >>>> Nanostations as PTP links because they are cheap. I see that the ePMPs >>>> get close to the same price point as the larger Nanostations and we are >>>> wondering if they are a better option. Does anyone have experience with >>>> both and some perspective which is a better option for PTP links that are >>>> less than a mile and need 25 -50 Mbps? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *David Coudron* >>>> >>>> david.coud...@advantenon.com | *Mobile: *612-991-7474 >>>> <(612)%20991-7474> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Advantenon, Inc. * <image001.jpg> >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/Advantenon> <image002.jpg> >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/Advantenon> <image003.jpg> >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/Advantenon> <image004.jpg> >>>> <http://blog.advantenon.com/> >>>> >>>> i...@advantenon.com | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN >>>> 55447 | www.advantenon.com | *Phone:* 800-704-4720 >>>> <(800)%20704-4720> | *Local: *612-454-1545 <(612)%20454-1545> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <image005.jpg> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Jeff Broadwick - Lists >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force110 vs Force200 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd use a couple of Force 200s in PTP mode. >>>> >>>> Jeff Broadwick >>>> >>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office >>>> >>>> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell >>>> >>>> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am looking for an inexpensive very low bandwidth replacement for a >>>> PTP400. I need less than a meg so throughput isn't an issue. I see they are >>>> both 5,10,20, and 40 MHz channel widths which is good. I can set it on 5MHz >>>> and get more than what I need and hopefully stay out of everyone else's >>>> way. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Unless I am looking at the wrong SKU it looks like the 110 is almost >>>> twice as much. Maybe I am not looking at complete kits or something? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From those that have used them, what do you think? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
