Boom! Drop the mic
On 7/29/2017 11:22 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
We love ALL of our children!
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
*Sent:* Friday, July 28, 2017 2:04 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450b specifications
Ouch! Lol
*From: *Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on
behalf of Josh Luthman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Date: *Friday, July 28, 2017 at 2:22 PM
*To: *"[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450b specifications
EPMP team showing the PMP450 guys how it's done *flex*
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
/*Gino A. Villarini*/
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
First one will look a lot like the Force 180. List is $299. Full
band, full speed.
Second one will look like the Force 200 (scheduled for October).
List is $349 IIRC.
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 <tel:%28312%29%20205-2519> Office
574-220-7826 <tel:%28574%29%20220-7826> Cell
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:03 PM, Gino A. Villarini <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What is the 450b?
On 7/28/17, 12:55 PM, "Af on behalf of Matt Mangriotis"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf
of [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
>Joe - I just answered your forum post... but might as well
repeat and add
>to it here too.
>
>You guys are right in that the combination of the two factors
are what
>matters to the modulation that the radio will achieve. You
have to be
>above a certain absolute power level (RSL), but ALSO have
enough distance
>(SNR) above the noise to decipher the bits. That is, even if
you're
>receiving the intended signal at -55, but have noise at -70,
the 15 dB
>separation (i.e. SNR) isn't enough to allow for 256QAM
modulation.
>
>Regarding sensitivity levels, the easiest place for me to
find these is
>in the Link Capacity Planner Tool:
>https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/capacityplanner/
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.cambiumnetworks.com%2Ffiles%2Fcapacityplanner%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7C13dfe165df294955425808d4d5eb791b%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636368654723361813&sdata=OZjdEgdNOlKSuSNP261i82pkSU28heLFmo3IIyHE0NE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>You can input the radios you're using and it'll spit those out.
>
>During final product testing, we've determined that the 450b is
>equivalent to the 450i SM in these specifications, so until
that tool
>gets updated with official numbers (which may vary slightly),
I would use
>that.
>
>Hope this helps,
>Matt
>
>
/*Gino A. Villarini*/
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
-----Original Message-----
>From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Falaschi
>Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:49 AM
>To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450b specifications
>
>Sure it would. We have some links reporting a SNR above
32db, enough to
>get 8x but are weaker than -56 signals. So both matter.
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>> On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Chris Wright
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't SNR play a bigger role than general signal level?
What good is
>>-67.8dBm if the noise floor is -75dBm?
>>
>> Chris Wright
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe
Falaschi
>> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:28 AM
>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450b specifications
>>
>> We�re looking at some questions of why certain links are at
certain
>>modulations (uplink is better than downlink). It�s
explained by the
>>spec sheet of the current equipment and RX sensitivity.
Basically the
>>450M AP can do more with less signal than the CPE can.
Specs below. In
>>any case we were then wondering what the new 450b RX
sensitivity would
>>be. There is a spec sheet on the Cambium website but this
isn�t listed.
>> Anyone have this information?
>>
>> 450M AP RX sensitivity
>> 1x = - 93.5 dBm
>> 2x = -88.6 dBm
>> 4x = -81.5 dBm
>> 6x = -75.9.0 dBm
>> 8x = -67.8 dBm
>>
>> 450SM RX sensitivity
>> 1x = -84 dBm
>> 2x = -80.5 dBm
>> 4x = -74 dBm
>> 6x = -66.9 dBm
>> 8x = -56 dBm
>>
>> 450i SM RX sensitivity
>> 1x = -85.9 dBm
>> 2x = -81.5 dBm
>> 4x = -75.8 dBm
>> 6x = -69.3 dBm
>> 8x = -61.6 dBm
>>
>> Joe Falaschi
>> e-vergent
>>
>
--
