This is all I've ever used, beyond my very first two sectors. I'm not aware of a reason to ever use mastic.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Skorup" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 6:43:06 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small 5ghz antennas Silicone-rubber tape. On 9/14/2017 4:05 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: cold shrink tubing I suppose. Not sure if they make it that small. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Steve Jones" < [email protected] > To: "[email protected]" < [email protected] > Sent: 9/14/2017 4:52:42 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small 5ghz antennas <blockquote> you can use rfelements connectorized with the 2000 series or quickport with the 1000 series, thats probably your smallest footprint solution. if you find a clean way to weatherize the top of the 2000 AP with the connectorized that doesnt involve mastic please update On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Nate Burke < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I'm looking to install an EPMP AP where the subs (force 180's) are only going to be about 100 yards away, and within a few degrees of each other. There is an existing mount already installed on the AP side, but it cannot handle something the size of a normal sector. There is a bare FSK AP installed today, so that's the form factor I'm replacing. Replacing the mount would be very difficult. Any recommendations for small antennas for the EPMP line? There are other EPMP Ap's at the site, so I would like to keep sync on the AP side, otherwise I would just throw on a Force180 as an AP and be done. </blockquote> </blockquote>
