This highlights something I've been complaining about.
I found the open internet order to be mostly harmless, possibly
pointless. I'm neutral on whether it stays or goes. Literally
*Everyone* I've heard talking about it on both sides is presenting an
argument that is not based on any facts. Literally all arguments don't
hold up to basic scrutiny.
Most Pro neutrality people argue that the internet will be destroyed
without net neutrality rules, and offer no evidence that this will
happen. A handful have lists of bad behaviors that ISP's have engaged
in, such as Madison River blocking competing VoIP services, but for the
most part they're listing activities that the offender was punished for
without any Net Neutrality rules in place.
The other camp basically says rules are bad because rules are bad. They
also offer no compelling evidence.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 11/27/2017 10:38:37 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Best NN Article I've Read
https://blog.streamingmedia.com/2017/11/net-neutrality-is-a-sham.html
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
