Don't try to do it at L2. Build it as router-to-router OSPF+BGP adjacency across the two separate Integra links.
Build it as two OSPF /30 links and use OSPF cost to adjust traffic accordingly. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > So we will be doing this integra 2+0 link. We got dinged by sprint though > on the PCN. so we have to drop one sides power on one channel since this > path has no other channels. This drops that one chain to 256qam (for > reliability) from 1024 so 643-514mbps. This model 2+0 the radios dont > communicate so its really just 2 separate links handled externally > > so I go from (643+643) / (643+643) to (514+643) / (643+643) > > Is there any way with LACP to account for this single path that will be > lower than the other two? > > There is nothing that fully ties me to LACP. I have the option of HP > procurve switches or Mikrotik CCR routers to handle the aggregation. > > As best I can tell LACP doesnt have any granular throughput definition, > just splits traffic across all interfaces (last i read, routeros and the hp > OS both allow full aggregate speed instead of single streams being limited > to individual port throughput) > > In my case with 1.2gbps i still have an 800mbpsish overflow issue. so If > there is an aggregation thats semi dynamic and granular to actual link > capacity, that would tickle my goat > > any advice from the sages? > > Id like to keep my switch/routers solution to under 1k per side, much less > if possible. I already have HP 1810g-24 that i believe will handle this, so > theyre effectively free >
