im not being argumentative btw, im outside my scope, just showing my data sources. I honestly dont know what to do here.
If a contractor here wants to offer some services, i have that budget as well. Im not certain our usual contractor will give me what i need... and butch doesnt answer my emails On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=110400 > > If Im reading the mikrotik guy (MRZ) response correctly. mikrotik will > balance a single stream across multiple ports > > I put my comprehension at a 10% reliability, so.... > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You will have the same limitation using LACP. >> >> On Jan 12, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> that will limit single stream to single port speed, will it not? So I >> would end up saturating one link while not using the other if a single >> stream were to get heavy? >> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Don't try to do it at L2. Build it as router-to-router OSPF+BGP >>> adjacency across the two separate Integra links. >>> >>> Build it as two OSPF /30 links and use OSPF cost to adjust traffic >>> accordingly. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> So we will be doing this integra 2+0 link. We got dinged by sprint >>>> though on the PCN. so we have to drop one sides power on one channel since >>>> this path has no other channels. This drops that one chain to 256qam (for >>>> reliability) from 1024 so 643-514mbps. This model 2+0 the radios dont >>>> communicate so its really just 2 separate links handled externally >>>> >>>> so I go from (643+643) / (643+643) to (514+643) / (643+643) >>>> >>>> Is there any way with LACP to account for this single path that will be >>>> lower than the other two? >>>> >>>> There is nothing that fully ties me to LACP. I have the option of HP >>>> procurve switches or Mikrotik CCR routers to handle the aggregation. >>>> >>>> As best I can tell LACP doesnt have any granular throughput definition, >>>> just splits traffic across all interfaces (last i read, routeros and the hp >>>> OS both allow full aggregate speed instead of single streams being limited >>>> to individual port throughput) >>>> >>>> In my case with 1.2gbps i still have an 800mbpsish overflow issue. so >>>> If there is an aggregation thats semi dynamic and granular to actual link >>>> capacity, that would tickle my goat >>>> >>>> any advice from the sages? >>>> >>>> Id like to keep my switch/routers solution to under 1k per side, much >>>> less if possible. I already have HP 1810g-24 that i believe will handle >>>> this, so theyre effectively free >>>> >>> >>> >> >
