so what options do I have here/ we are currently bench testing lacp in HP switches to get moving, but need a longer term better solution
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:38 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > im not being argumentative btw, im outside my scope, just showing my data > sources. I honestly dont know what to do here. > > > If a contractor here wants to offer some services, i have that budget as > well. Im not certain our usual contractor will give me what i need... and > butch doesnt answer my emails > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=110400 >> >> If Im reading the mikrotik guy (MRZ) response correctly. mikrotik will >> balance a single stream across multiple ports >> >> I put my comprehension at a 10% reliability, so.... >> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You will have the same limitation using LACP. >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> that will limit single stream to single port speed, will it not? So I >>> would end up saturating one link while not using the other if a single >>> stream were to get heavy? >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Don't try to do it at L2. Build it as router-to-router OSPF+BGP >>>> adjacency across the two separate Integra links. >>>> >>>> Build it as two OSPF /30 links and use OSPF cost to adjust traffic >>>> accordingly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> So we will be doing this integra 2+0 link. We got dinged by sprint >>>>> though on the PCN. so we have to drop one sides power on one channel since >>>>> this path has no other channels. This drops that one chain to 256qam (for >>>>> reliability) from 1024 so 643-514mbps. This model 2+0 the radios dont >>>>> communicate so its really just 2 separate links handled externally >>>>> >>>>> so I go from (643+643) / (643+643) to (514+643) / (643+643) >>>>> >>>>> Is there any way with LACP to account for this single path that will >>>>> be lower than the other two? >>>>> >>>>> There is nothing that fully ties me to LACP. I have the option of HP >>>>> procurve switches or Mikrotik CCR routers to handle the aggregation. >>>>> >>>>> As best I can tell LACP doesnt have any granular throughput >>>>> definition, just splits traffic across all interfaces (last i read, >>>>> routeros and the hp OS both allow full aggregate speed instead of single >>>>> streams being limited to individual port throughput) >>>>> >>>>> In my case with 1.2gbps i still have an 800mbpsish overflow issue. so >>>>> If there is an aggregation thats semi dynamic and granular to actual link >>>>> capacity, that would tickle my goat >>>>> >>>>> any advice from the sages? >>>>> >>>>> Id like to keep my switch/routers solution to under 1k per side, much >>>>> less if possible. I already have HP 1810g-24 that i believe will handle >>>>> this, so theyre effectively free >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
