I recall the AF team in the Chicago area running Exfo or JDSU RFC2544 tests on some of their test links, and getting them to pass.
Have seen the same results with flow control turned on or off. Right now I can't turn off inband management because we will lose visibility into the far end of the radio link, but will try it. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> wrote: > Siklu would be a better radio for this link. > > I don't recall anyone ever running that test on Airfiber radios from what > I've read. > > On Jan 15, 2018 11:27 AM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Same results for sequence errors either with or without flow control > enabled on the radios, and switch ports that connect to them. > > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> What are the flow control settings? I remember seeing a graph that flow >> control has a big effect on whether AirFibers can hit near the full speed. >> >> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Ubiquiti people who might be watching the list, >>> >>> If you're watching the list, please contact me... I have an AF24 link >>> with "perfect" RF characteristics that won't pass a 500 Mbps full duplex >>> RFC2544 test. It also fails MEF y.1731 tests at the same data rate. >>> >>> 1.70 km, -55 RSL symmetric on both sides, radios report 774 Mbps >>> capacity full duplex. >>> >>> We have already replaced a radio on one end, the data cables, tried >>> bypassing surge protectors, and replaced cables. >>> >>> This link performs normally with 0.00% packet loss and full duplex layer >>> 3 IP traffic. Between Adva metro Ethernet equipment we can't get a 500 Mbps >>> test to run cleanly. >>> >> >> > >
