Chuck,
Which legislator is proposing this? I got Senator Bramble to back his off
a few years ago after a conversation with him.
-Layne
Sent from my iPhone, so please excuse any misspelled words or embarrassing
auto-corrects!
On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:11 AM, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The proposed solution is that any ISP over 500 customers has to provide some
kind of blocking technology to prevent harm to minors. And it cannot be a 3rd
party solution.
I want to come up with an exhaustive list of all the potential ways minors can
select harmful things on the internet. There is more than just web pages out
there.
From: Zach Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking
Are you talking about
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet
this style of blocking?
If you are talking about that style of blocking then as ISP we fight this as it
is not the ISP job to block.
If someone wants to block this type of content when the parent should be in
change of installing blocking software and picking what should be blocked.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
I have some proposed legislation I am facing about porn blocking again. But
they are not defining the type of service. It is one thing to block web
traffic, but how about netflix or twitter or skype or......
I want to play defense here and force the lawmakers to define exactly what we
need to block.
So can you guys help me develop a list of all the things we would have to
analyze and block if we were going to attempt to create a true device that
protects kids.
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA)
My website<http://zachunderwood.me>
advance-networking.com<http://advance-networking.com>
