Wish someone would do that for me.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 10:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking
Similar here, but the opposite. "Bad stuff" comes up on whatever we are
watching, and I have to put my hand over her eyes and sing something pleasant
and hit the mute on the remote. It's a ritual.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/6/2018 8:55 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I couldn’t do it. I even block my eyes during some movies because I don’t
want any more bad images in the brain. My wife thinks I am being silly. I do
it on tv shows that are showing real dead folk too. Something sacrilegious
about broadcasting the half nude body of some young girl that was murdered.
Not a prude though, boobs are good.
From: Steve Jones
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking
thats the same in law enforcement, one of the police fellas I know had a gig
similar, you dont get to unsee any of that
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
If the ISP Is required to run it's own filtering, without a 3rd party, also
be prepared for the increase of staff and their counseling needs. I was just
trying to find it, but my Googleskillz are failing me presently. I remember
reading an article where it was talking about a content blocking company, the
Employee turnover rate was extremely high, and many required counseling after
leaving the job because of what they saw while determining if content should be
blocked.
On 2/6/2018 10:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The proposed solution is that any ISP over 500 customers has to provide
some kind of blocking technology to prevent harm to minors. And it cannot be a
3rd party solution.
I want to come up with an exhaustive list of all the potential ways
minors can select harmful things on the internet. There is more than just web
pages out there.
From: Zach Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking
Are you talking about
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet
this style of blocking?
If you are talking about that style of blocking then as ISP we fight this
as it is not the ISP job to block.
If someone wants to block this type of content when the parent should be
in change of installing blocking software and picking what should be blocked.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
I have some proposed legislation I am facing about porn blocking again.
But they are not defining the type of service. It is one thing to block web
traffic, but how about netflix or twitter or skype or......
I want to play defense here and force the lawmakers to define exactly
what we need to block.
So can you guys help me develop a list of all the things we would have
to analyze and block if we were going to attempt to create a true device that
protects kids.
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA)
My website
advance-networking.com