Wish someone would do that for me.

From: Bill Prince 
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 10:21 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking

Similar here, but the opposite. "Bad stuff" comes up on whatever we are 
watching, and I have to put my hand over her eyes and sing something pleasant 
and hit the mute on the remote. It's a ritual.



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 2/6/2018 8:55 AM, [email protected] wrote:

  I couldn’t do it.  I even block my eyes during some movies because I don’t 
want any more bad images in the brain.  My wife thinks I am being silly.  I do 
it on tv shows that are showing real dead folk too.  Something sacrilegious 
about broadcasting the half nude body of some young girl that was murdered.  

  Not a prude though, boobs are good.

  From: Steve Jones 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:38 AM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking

  thats the same in law enforcement, one of the police fellas I know had a gig 
similar, you dont get to unsee any of that

  On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:

    If the ISP Is required to run it's own filtering, without a 3rd party, also 
be prepared for the increase of staff and their counseling needs.  I was just 
trying to find it, but my Googleskillz are failing me presently.  I remember 
reading an article where it was talking about a content blocking company, the 
Employee turnover rate was extremely high, and many required counseling after 
leaving the job because of what they saw while determining if content should be 
blocked.  


    On 2/6/2018 10:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:

      The proposed solution is that any ISP over 500 customers has to provide 
some kind of blocking technology to prevent harm to minors.  And it cannot be a 
3rd party solution.

      I want to come up with an exhaustive list of all the potential ways 
minors can select harmful things on the internet.  There is more than just web 
pages out there.  

      From: Zach Underwood 
      Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:01 AM
      To: [email protected] 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking

      Are you talking about 
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet
 this style of blocking?  
      If you are talking about that style of blocking then as ISP we fight this 
as it is not the ISP job to block. 

      If someone wants to block this type of content when the parent should be 
in change of installing blocking software and picking what should be blocked.

      On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

        I have some proposed legislation I am facing about porn blocking again. 
 But they are not defining the type of service.  It is one thing to block web 
traffic, but how about netflix or twitter or skype or......

        I want to play defense here and force the lawmakers to define exactly 
what we need to block.
        So can you guys help me develop a list of all the things we would have 
to analyze and block if we were going to attempt to create a true device that 
protects kids.






      -- 

      Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA) 
      My website

      advance-networking.com





Reply via email to