I couldn’t do it. I even block my eyes during some movies because I don’t want any more bad images in the brain. My wife thinks I am being silly. I do it on tv shows that are showing real dead folk too. Something sacrilegious about broadcasting the half nude body of some young girl that was murdered.
Not a prude though, boobs are good. From: Steve Jones Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking thats the same in law enforcement, one of the police fellas I know had a gig similar, you dont get to unsee any of that On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: If the ISP Is required to run it's own filtering, without a 3rd party, also be prepared for the increase of staff and their counseling needs. I was just trying to find it, but my Googleskillz are failing me presently. I remember reading an article where it was talking about a content blocking company, the Employee turnover rate was extremely high, and many required counseling after leaving the job because of what they saw while determining if content should be blocked. On 2/6/2018 10:09 AM, [email protected] wrote: The proposed solution is that any ISP over 500 customers has to provide some kind of blocking technology to prevent harm to minors. And it cannot be a 3rd party solution. I want to come up with an exhaustive list of all the potential ways minors can select harmful things on the internet. There is more than just web pages out there. From: Zach Underwood Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking Are you talking about https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet this style of blocking? If you are talking about that style of blocking then as ISP we fight this as it is not the ISP job to block. If someone wants to block this type of content when the parent should be in change of installing blocking software and picking what should be blocked. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: I have some proposed legislation I am facing about porn blocking again. But they are not defining the type of service. It is one thing to block web traffic, but how about netflix or twitter or skype or...... I want to play defense here and force the lawmakers to define exactly what we need to block. So can you guys help me develop a list of all the things we would have to analyze and block if we were going to attempt to create a true device that protects kids. -- Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA) My website advance-networking.com
