Similar here, but the opposite. "Bad stuff" comes up on whatever we are
watching, and I have to put my hand over her eyes and sing something
pleasant and hit the mute on the remote. It's a ritual.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/6/2018 8:55 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I couldn’t do it. I even block my eyes during some movies because I
don’t want any more bad images in the brain. My wife thinks I am
being silly. I do it on tv shows that are showing real dead folk
too. Something sacrilegious about broadcasting the half nude body of
some young girl that was murdered.
Not a prude though, boobs are good.
*From:* Steve Jones
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:38 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] blocking
thats the same in law enforcement, one of the police fellas I know had
a gig similar, you dont get to unsee any of that
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
If the ISP Is required to run it's own filtering, without a 3rd
party, also be prepared for the increase of staff and their
counseling needs. I was just trying to find it, but my
Googleskillz are failing me presently. I remember reading an
article where it was talking about a content blocking company, the
Employee turnover rate was extremely high, and many required
counseling after leaving the job because of what they saw while
determining if content should be blocked.
On 2/6/2018 10:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The proposed solution is that any ISP over 500 customers has to
provide some kind of blocking technology to prevent harm to
minors. And it cannot be a 3rd party solution.
I want to come up with an exhaustive list of all the potential
ways minors can select harmful things on the internet. There is
more than just web pages out there.
*From:* Zach Underwood
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:01 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] blocking
Are you talking about
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet
<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet>
this style of blocking?
If you are talking about that style of blocking then as ISP we
fight this as it is not the ISP job to block.
If someone wants to block this type of content when the parent
should be in change of installing blocking software and picking
what should be blocked.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
I have some proposed legislation I am facing about porn
blocking again. But they are not defining the type of
service. It is one thing to block web traffic, but how about
netflix or twitter or skype or......
I want to play defense here and force the lawmakers to define
exactly what we need to block.
So can you guys help me develop a list of all the things we
would have to analyze and block if we were going to attempt
to create a true device that protects kids.
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA)
My website <http://zachunderwood.me>
advance-networking.com <http://advance-networking.com>
