Doesn't much matter. We don't like n's of any size.
------ Original Message ------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 4/27/2018 1:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS
Interesting, I didn’t now little “n” had a definition.
From:Steve Jones
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:45 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS
They claim nLOS not NLOS. To cambium, 1/16 fresnel impact is nLOS
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 5:52 PM Christopher Gray
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm definitely not expecting Cambium to go through a forest in 5
GHz... but they specifically claim NLOS capability.
I have several NLOS 5 GHz links going through leaves at very short
ranges that are relatively stable (all ePMP). I'm just curious about
what makes them claim their NLOS is better.
I'll look into the subcarries as Stanners suggested.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]>
wrote:
NLOS "magic" in 5ghz? Don't hold your breath, man.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Christopher Gray
<[email protected]> wrote:
I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that
helps with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the
custom chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others
in similar signal NLOS environments?
The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the
NLOS magic?
In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to
significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware?
Thank you - Chris
