calling for total and complete shutdown of n's entering the United States On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Doesn't much matter. We don't like n's of any size. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Sent: 4/27/2018 1:28:53 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS > > Interesting, I didn’t now little “n” had a definition. > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:45 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS > > They claim nLOS not NLOS. To cambium, 1/16 fresnel impact is nLOS > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 5:52 PM Christopher Gray <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm definitely not expecting Cambium to go through a forest in 5 GHz... >> but they specifically claim NLOS capability. >> >> I have several NLOS 5 GHz links going through leaves at very short ranges >> that are relatively stable (all ePMP). I'm just curious about what makes >> them claim their NLOS is better. >> >> I'll look into the subcarries as Stanners suggested. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> NLOS "magic" in 5ghz? Don't hold your breath, man. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Christopher Gray < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that helps >>>> with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the custom >>>> chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others in similar >>>> signal NLOS environments? >>>> >>>> The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the NLOS >>>> magic? >>>> >>>> >>>> In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to >>>> significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware? >>>> >>>> Thank you - Chris >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
