Yeah but I had never seen a number put to it before. Yes there is some list delay again... dang it.
From: Christopher Gray Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS I usually see: NLOS = Non Line-of-Sight nLOS = near Line-of-Sight -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Interesting, I didn’t now little “n” had a definition. From: Steve Jones Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS They claim nLOS not NLOS. To cambium, 1/16 fresnel impact is nLOS On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 5:52 PM Christopher Gray <[email protected]> wrote: I'm definitely not expecting Cambium to go through a forest in 5 GHz... but they specifically claim NLOS capability. I have several NLOS 5 GHz links going through leaves at very short ranges that are relatively stable (all ePMP). I'm just curious about what makes them claim their NLOS is better. I'll look into the subcarries as Stanners suggested. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: NLOS "magic" in 5ghz? Don't hold your breath, man. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Christopher Gray <[email protected]> wrote: I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that helps with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the custom chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others in similar signal NLOS environments? The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the NLOS magic? In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware? Thank you - Chris
