OK, I will replace all 8 cards and see what happens.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> If a surge suppressor gets wounded it can cause all kinds of problems.  As
> a sacrificial element, it is sometimes not clear if they have taken too
> many hits.  Best way to test is just bypass and see what happens.
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Monday, April 30, 2018 12:16 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Problems with Packetflux Powerinjector
>
> It's probably 20-30 feet of cat5 at the most.  I've been doing 24v since
> day one and it's gone through a couple of winters now.  Thing is that we
> don't reboot when it's 5* and the batteries are all inside on the ground.
>
> Chuck...would epmp have problems here rebooting/not powering for a few
> minutes with bad SS cards?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Suite 1337
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Troy, OH 45373
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> IIRC the issues are connected if the surge suppressors are in line. I
>> dont recall if the ones we had that were rebooting were resolved with just
>> the port speed or bypassing.
>> Using 48 v makes sure the EPMP doesnt freeze, they will with the 24, and
>> if its long runs the power drop may be an issue too
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> No ethernet problems - it's POWER.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Suite 1337
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you have the old MT surge suppressors with EPMP there was an issue
>>>> with this and negotiation. I believe current revisions have resolved it.
>>>> Also, if you are only running 20mhz channels you dont need gigabit
>>>> connectivity, so you can lock ports to 100mbps to help
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've got two of these with problems: http://store.packetflux.com/
>>>>> powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version/
>>>>>
>>>>> However one of these gives me no problems:
>>>>> http://store.packetflux.com/sitemonitor-4-channel-gigabit-
>>>>> poe-injector-controller/
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a 24vdc plant going up the tower.  In the box it feeds these
>>>>> three Packetflux units.  The 4 channel POE injector has given me 0 
>>>>> problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got Cambium ePMP on the PowerInjector and it has been randomly?
>>>>> rebooting units for several months.  Yesterday one of the ports just
>>>>> decided to turn off for 20 minutes and come right back.  We've replaced 
>>>>> the
>>>>> line & radio to make sure it's the box, but all signs point to it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone else seen this or am I lucky in getting the only two units
>>>>> with power problems on them?  AFAIK sync has been just as reliable as the
>>>>> power through them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to