On 12/6/18 5:22 AM, Noureddine IDBOUFKER via AfrIPv6-Discuss wrote:
I think that Top management is not enough *aware *of business
opportunities behind IPv6 migration.
Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a high number of
objects, equipements, services,.... but it is not limited to that.
Top management has to encourage their people to be express their
innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute to the
developpement of Value Added Services.
Providers who will not propose new competitive service catalogue will
simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat IPv6 is
a real pillar of IT governance.
I agree with that. I have several presentations on business reasons for
IPv6, which I imagine overlap with AFRINIC's IPv6 for Executives training:
* Not running out of addresses, so you can keep adding customers
* Faster [1]
* Because it's faster, Google page rank is higher; more customers see
your web site
* Because it's faster, users spend more time on the page; more ad revenue
* IPv6 is on by default; may present security risks if not secured
* Use addresses to identify services; easier policy routing, ACLs,
security, troubleshooting, etc.
* New diagnostic tools PDM [rfc8250] and maybe M-PDM
[draft-fear-ippm-mpdm]
* Simpler container networking [2]
* Segment Routing with IPv6: no MPLS/LDP/RSVP-TE/NSH, it's all just
IP. [3]
The last few are cutting-edge developments that are not widely available
yet, but are examples of innovations enabled by IPv6. I didn't even list
"It's not NAT" because you're likely to use some kind of address sharing
to reach legacy IPv4 sites, but that need declines as others deploy, and
it may be cheaper than NAT44.
IPv6 is cool.
Lee
[1] https://stats.labs.apnic.net/v6perf/XB
[2] *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF50OxZ5u4o*
*[3] ***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUN68P6UAn0**
**
Regards
-----------------------------------------------
Noureddine IDBOUFKER
Le jeudi 6 décembre 2018 à 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via
AfrIPv6-Discuss <[email protected]> a écrit :
Operators are informed, if you speak about “engineers”, the problem is
to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in
each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have
relevant web sites, etc.).
I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago.
Regards,
Jordi
*De: *Pascal ANDRIANISA <[email protected]>
*Responder a: *IPv6 in Africa Discussions <[email protected]>
*Fecha: *jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47
*Para: *IPv6 in Africa Discussions <[email protected]>
*Asunto: *Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop
people moving to IPv6
Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform
the operators in each country of the situation because if only the
members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it
optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already
been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the
situation. Best regard,
*Pascal*Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA *R*esearch and *E*ducation
*N*etwork for *A*cademic and *L*earning *A*ctivities -
http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Ministère de l'Enseignement
Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana_GSM _:+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*De: *"Mukom Akong T." <[email protected]> *À: *"IPv6 in Africa"
<[email protected]> *Envoyé: *Jeudi 6 Décembre 2018 06:41:29
*Objet: *Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop
people moving to IPv6
> > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying
decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't
do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea.
Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or
v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible
(or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the
role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban
importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already
done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying
cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get
upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold
at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even
worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet
aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment.
> > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified"
sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of
testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which
might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to
put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with
$ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set
up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their
testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days
of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate
infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type
approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach
out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness
Self Assessment at ENGLISH → https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en
FRENCH → https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have
been an IPv6 advocate – and I still am – and I’ve actively deployed
and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple
percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a
result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and
thrive – it’s time we started being a little more open and honest
about the challenges and problems with it – instead of sprouting off
that everyone should just move to it. Let’s acknowledge that IPv6 is
critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major
problems, and until start dealing with those – we will see deployment
continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just
another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any
kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of
equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems
they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion
at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with
IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC
issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this
mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There
are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing,
someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my
answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in
solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three
things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from:
> > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several
revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses.
> > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone.
These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our
deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's
surprising how many operators need help with their address planning.
Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space
they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM. For those
interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can
be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by
step walk-through of address planning best practices and
implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and
IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is
this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying
IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them
from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with
incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes
is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a
request at bit.ly/6deployEN <http://bit.ly/6deployEN> (english)
bit.ly/6deployFR <http://bit.ly/6deployFR> (french) As we do this,
we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually
HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it
and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that
incompatible equipment is not in the top 5.
We're also realising that that argument from big operators about
"customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large
operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written
requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want
to see their response :(
If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country
- 5% teaching, 95% DOing
- using our Prototype → Validate → Develop → Deploy framework
- enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours
you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en (or
https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french)
And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their
organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness
Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en (or
https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French)
The results might provide pointers where to start the process.
Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom |
twitter: @perfexcellent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering
of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss
mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
_______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss
mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive
use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
this information, even if partially, including attached files, is
strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you
are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original
sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
