Sure there are many opportunities behind Transition to IPv6 but unfortunately, 
for African Operators in each country, there is also a risk. Every day elapsed 
before this transition moves them towards a very risky situation. I talk about 
Business and also technical risks. Unfortunately, the majority of operators has 
an urgency mindset.  I am really convinced that in order to encourage them to 
transit to IPv6, African Communities has to focus on risks and the urgency 
aspect of the transition. For example leading studies in order to produce a 
kind of SWOT Matrix, adapted to the African context, establishing Strengths, 
Weaknesses, Threats and Opportunities.
Regards-----------------------------------------------
Noureddine IDBOUFKERhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/idboufkernoureddine/
 

    Le jeudi 6 décembre 2018 à 15:51:06 UTC+1, Lee Howard 
<[email protected]> a écrit :  
 
  

 
 On 12/6/18 5:22 AM, Noureddine IDBOUFKER via AfrIPv6-Discuss wrote:
  
 
  I think that Top management is not enough aware of business opportunities 
behind IPv6 migration.  Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a 
high number of objects, equipements, services,....  but it is not limited to 
that. Top management has to encourage their people to be express their 
innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute  to the developpement of 
Value Added Services.  Providers who will not propose new competitive service 
catalogue will simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat 
IPv6 is a real pillar of IT governance. 
    
I agree with that. I have several presentations on business reasons for IPv6, 
which I imagine overlap with AFRINIC's IPv6 for Executives training:
    
   - Not running out of addresses, so you can keep adding customers
   - Faster [1]   
 
   - Because it's faster, Google page rank is higher; more customers see your 
web site   
 
   - Because it's faster, users spend more time on the page; more ad revenue   
 
   - IPv6 is on by default; may present security risks if not secured
   - Use addresses to identify services; easier policy routing, ACLs, security, 
troubleshooting, etc.
   - New diagnostic tools PDM [rfc8250] and maybe M-PDM [draft-fear-ippm-mpdm]
   - Simpler container networking [2]   
 
   - Segment Routing with IPv6: no MPLS/LDP/RSVP-TE/NSH, it's all just IP. [3]  
 
 
 
The last few are cutting-edge developments that are not widely available yet, 
but are examples of innovations enabled by IPv6. I didn't even list "It's not 
NAT" because you're likely to use some kind of address sharing to reach legacy 
IPv4 sites, but that need declines as others deploy, and it may be cheaper than 
NAT44.
 
IPv6 is cool.
 
 
Lee
 
 
[1] https://stats.labs.apnic.net/v6perf/XB 
 
 
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF50OxZ5u4o 
 
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUN68P6UAn0
 

 
   Regards 
  -----------------------------------------------
 Noureddine IDBOUFKER  
  
      Le jeudi 6 décembre 2018 à 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via 
AfrIPv6-Discuss <[email protected]> a écrit :  
  
      
Operators are informed, if you speak about “engineers”, the problem is to 
inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country 
(financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.).
 
  
 
I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago.
  

 Regards,
 
Jordi
 
  
  
  
 
  
   
De: Pascal ANDRIANISA <[email protected]>
 Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions <[email protected]>
 Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47
 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions <[email protected]>
 Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people 
moving to IPv6
   
  
    Dear All,

I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each 
country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it 
will not be possible to use it optimally.
I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think 
that all the members are aware of the situation.

Best regard,   Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA
 Webmaster i RENALA
 Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - 
http://www.irenala.edu.mg/
 Porte 201 - Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche 
Scientifique - Fiadanana
 GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |  +261 (0) 34 30 680 29        De: "Mukom Akong 
T." <[email protected]>
À: "IPv6 in Africa" <[email protected]>
Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Décembre 2018 06:41:29
Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people 
moving to IPv6              

>
> Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If 
> something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not 
> think consumer education about IP is a good idea.



Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But 
they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or 
cheaper) with v6.


This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of 
national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. 
Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today.



> ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't 
> get upgrades.
> Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts.


I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be 
"sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which 
further cripples IPv6 deployment.

>
> Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. 
> CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests 
> complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 
> 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, 
> "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business 
> opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs 
> could outsource their testing and certification.


In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) 
and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government 
implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should 
reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness 
Self Assessment at  

ENGLISH → https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en
FRENCH →  https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr


> For years I have been an IPv6 advocate – and I still am – and I’ve actively 
> deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with 
> multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a 
> result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive – 
> it’s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges 
> and problems with it – instead of sprouting off that everyone should just 
> move to it.   Let’s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but 
> it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with 
> those – we will see deployment continue to stutter


I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" 
where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a 
fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on 
an on about problems they've only heard about.


>
> Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make 
> progress on resolving issues with IPv6?
>


Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have 
encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up 
to a webinar or discussion at AIS.


There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone 
somewhere has solved those problems.


> The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 
> provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of 
> hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to 
> draw from:
>
> 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's 
> normal.
>
> 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses.
>
> 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone.


These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our 
deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising 
how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only 
do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to 
implement them in an IPAM.  For those interested, a video of a highly attended 
and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s

Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation 
in an IPAM ---- no maths!


>
> AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. 


The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month 
that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and 
coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get 
stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it 
takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a 
request at  


bit.ly/6deployEN   (english)
bit.ly/6deployFR    (french)

As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what 
actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it 
and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible 
equipment is not in the top 5.   We're also realising that that argument from 
big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of 
large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests 
to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their 
response :(      If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your 
country       - 5% teaching, 95% DOing   - using our Prototype → Validate → 
Develop → Deploy framework   - enables you hit a measurable deployment 
milestone within 8 hours      you can apply at:  
https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en (or 
https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french)      And for those who are 
still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free 
Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at  
https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en  (or 
https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French)   
The results might provide pointers where to start the process.      Until next 
time ..... be EXCELLENT

-- 

Mukom Akong T.

LinkedIn:Mukom  |  twitter: @perfexcellent  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the 
hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss   
  
   
_______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list 
[email protected] 
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss 
  
 **********************************************
 IPv4 is over
 Are you ready for the new Internet ?
 http://www.theipv6company.com
 The IPv6 Company
 
 This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached  files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
 
   _______________________________________________
 AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
 [email protected]
 https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
     
  _______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
 
 _______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
  
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss

Reply via email to