As a member: I have also read the document and don't have any issues.
Hartmut Reuter Douglas E. Engert wrote:
We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07 Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week, and this being the first, I would like extend that to Thursday December 16. Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues. If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making the point is having trouble expressing the issue. Members should read the document and if you have issues please state them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let us know that too. Please respond using the subject from this e-mail.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hartmut Reuter e-mail [email protected] phone +49-89-3299-1328 fax +49-89-3299-1301 RZG (Rechenzentrum Garching) web http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~hwr Computing Center of the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) and the Institut fuer Plasmaphysik (IPP) ----------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
