On 17 Dec 2010, at 16:21, Douglas E. Engert wrote: > The consensus call time period has ended. We have 10 responses with > ready to proceed. But Andrew Deason has brought up one issue > on "Implicit fallback mapping". > > Jeffrey Altman has asked about "wildcards patterns in mappings". > > The "Implicit fallback mapping" might be easily resolved with a few > words added to the document, and we could proceed with adoption. > > The "wildcards patterns in mappings" might need a lot more, discussion, > as I personally can think of these side issue:
My feeling is that both of these comments concern implementation specific issues. In addition, I think they've been raised very late. The mapping language has existed within this document since the first draft, originally published in April of this year. There have been numerous calls for review on this list since then. My belief is that Last Call should be a place for those who feel that earlier remarks have been ignored to raise their grievances, and for those who have only just reviewed the document to raise major concerns. I'm not convinced that they're an appropriate location for these kinds of minor issues which should have been raised much earlier in the process. Otherwise, why should anyone bother reading a document before Last Call? Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
