... > On 12/13/2010 1:00 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote: >> >> We are in the middle of a call for consensus, ending on December 16. >> So far no one has responded either way. As stated below: "If you have >> no issues, let us know that too." >> >> On 12/7/2010 1:07 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote: >>> >>> We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07 >>> >>> Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week, >>> and this being the first, I would like extend that to Thursday >>> December 16. >>> >>> Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement >>> by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues. >>> If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group >>> should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making >>> the point is having trouble expressing the issue. >>> >>> Members should read the document and if you have issues please state >>> them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let >>> us know that too. >>>
I have read the document and have no issues. Steven Jenkins _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
