I have no issues.
Kim
On 12/16/2010 10:06 AM, Steven Jenkins wrote:
...
On 12/13/2010 1:00 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
We are in the middle of a call for consensus, ending on December 16.
So far no one has responded either way. As stated below: "If you have
no issues, let us know that too."
On 12/7/2010 1:07 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07
Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week,
and this being the first, I would like extend that to Thursday
December 16.
Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement
by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues.
If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group
should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making
the point is having trouble expressing the issue.
Members should read the document and if you have issues please state
them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let
us know that too.
I have read the document and have no issues.
Steven Jenkins
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
