21.07.2011 8:20, Simon Wilkinson wrote
On 21 Jul 2011, at 06:00, Mykyta Yevstifeyev<[email protected]> wrote:
Reading this draft, I don't actually understand why you chose to publish it as
RFC.
We're using the Independent Submissions stream for afs3 documents. See RFC4846
for details of this stream, and it's purpose.
I've read RFC 4846 and have noticed you're using Independent Submissions
stream. Probably, the draft should be clearer regarding relationships
with currently deployed Internet protocols/technologies, since your
document "at the first glance" seems to be a bit irrelevant for the RFC
series. The counter conclusion may only be made by people who are
involved in the AFS development and other contiguous technologies (whom
I don't belong to), which makes the document not as readable as
desired. A good background placed in the Introduction is a good way to
resolve the issue.
Mykyta
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
