This call for consensus was to extend to 7/25 yesterday. So far I have only seen 2 "OK" responses from Derrick Brashear and David Boyes, and a "why are we doing this" from an outsider.
In the view of this chair, that does not constitute a consensus, and I will extend the call till Friday 7/29. On 7/15/2011 1:11 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/ Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week, and this being Friday afternoon, I would like to extend the period to Monday, 7/25/2011. Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues. If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making the point is having trouble expressing the issue. Members should read the document and if you have issues please state them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let us know that too. Please respond using the subject from this e-mail.
-- Douglas E. Engert <[email protected]> Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 (630) 252-5444 _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
