On Wed, 1 May 2013 11:09:36 -0400
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> In response to the comments made during the last-call period on this
> draft, I made some changes in my git repository, which are included inline
> below. Please let me know if you think your comment(s) have not been
> addressed either in an email reply or the changes below.
>
> I have not attempted to rewrite the description of the GSS negotiation
> loop for clarity. Looking at RFC 4462 (ssh gssapi keyex) for inspriation,
> it seems that the flow of description is largely similar, but the RFC's
> formatting is more spread out and helps readability. They have the luxury
> of being able to describe the messages sent in each direction on a
> per-message basis, after the outline of the GSS control flow. Our control
> flow does not have a persistent connection, and the client drives the loop
> using the GSSNegotiate RPC; I think it would be confusing to excise the
> actual message passing portions to the end of the description as is done
> in the ssh RFC.
>
> Reformatting could go hand-in-hand with adding subsections for the key
> negotiation section, but I'd like to hear from the chairs that it's worth
> the time before I go and do that. ("The document is going to need another
> last call" will be considered to imply "it's worth doing the work to
> reformat".)
Hello Ben,
Thank you Ben for making the changes to the draft based on the feedback for the
previous last call.
I do not hear a call for reformatting at this stage. I think it would helpful
if you could submit draft -05 based on the changes discussed on this list (and
are already in your githup repo).
Thank you,
Mike
--
Michael Meffie <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
