On Wed, 22 May 2013, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:35 -0400, Michael Meffie wrote:("The document is going to need another last call" will be considered to imply "it's worth doing the work to reformat".)I for one will have to see the updated document (and review the discussion) before I can form an opinion on whether another last call will be needed. So yes, it seems like an updated I-D would be useful at this point.
Okay, I added a commit to bump the version number and date, and submitted an -05: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-05.txt is up, but the htmlized one will need to wait a few minutes (apparently).
-Ben _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
