> > > I for one will have to see the updated document (and review the > > > discussion) before I can form an opinion on whether another last call > > > will be needed. So yes, it seems like an updated I-D would be useful at > > > this point. > > > > Okay, I added a commit to bump the version number and date, and submitted > > an -05: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-05.txt is up, but the > > htmlized one will need to wait a few minutes (apparently). > > Thank you Ben. I see the htmlized version is up now (including diffs). > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk/
Hello, I'd like to set a timeline here of one week from now for any comments on this updated document. Please post any comments or objections here before Friday May 31st, at 5:00pm EST. Jeffrey Hutzlemen, can you please review draft -05 with an eye for any process related issues? Best regards, Mike -- Michael Meffie <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
