On Wed, 22 May 2013 17:24:57 -0400
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:35 -0400, Michael Meffie wrote:
> >
> >>> ("The document is going to need another
> >>> last call" will be considered to imply "it's worth doing the work to
> >>> reformat".)
> >
> > I for one will have to see the updated document (and review the
> > discussion) before I can form an opinion on whether another last call
> > will be needed. So yes, it seems like an updated I-D would be useful at
> > this point.
>
> Okay, I added a commit to bump the version number and date, and submitted
> an -05:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-05.txt is up, but the
> htmlized one will need to wait a few minutes (apparently).
Thank you Ben. I see the htmlized version is up now (including diffs).
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk/
Thanks,
Mike
`
--
Michael Meffie <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
