He is not "wrong" because he is not doing anything viable. All he does
is generate horse shit. On this mailing list. On Reddit. On Amazon.
Search the list and you will find what I am doing instead of engaging in
this bullshit preschool psychology garbage. Or search for some "penis
length comparison" mailing list if you are into this nonsensical shit.
It's not belittling nor toxic behaviour to desire this total horse shit
to finally stop. If you suck at coding or can't read code then don't
comment.
His spam is as much about AGI as me posting random pages from a
telephone book. Do you get the analogy?
On 20/04/2019 23:51, MP via AGI wrote:
Hey, at least he's doing something with his life. Where's any work of
yours you spent decades on? Even if he's completely wrong - which I'm
sure he is - at least he has something he can claim as his life's work.
I don't appreciate anyone here belittling him, honestly. Yes, I know,
it's mostly ramblings, but again, he's at least trying to tackle the
grand challenge. What do any of his attackers have instead? Absolutely
nothing.
This toxic behavior against him is disgusting.
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Apr 20, 2019, 4:47 PM, justcamel < [email protected]> wrote:
Amazing that one brain can be so full of nonsense and still allow
the human to operate in this world ...
On 20/04/2019 23:24, A.T. Murray wrote:
Three days ago on impulse we began coding a Latin AI Mind in
JavaScript for MSIE. We used JavaScript for the sake of what
culture snobs call "accessability". In art or in culture, if a
work is "accessable", it means that even hoi polloi can
appreciate it. We classicists of ancient Greek and Latin are
extremely snobby, exceeded in this regard perhaps only by the
Egyptologists and by those who know Sanskrit. In fact, our local
university newspaper had an article a few weeks ago claiming that
there are five million modern speakers of Sanskrit and only nine
individual speakers worldwide who speak Latin as a second
language. Immediately I took offense because they obviously did
not include memetipsum among the precious nine speakers of Latin.
On the Internet I tried to hunt down the source of this
allegation, this lese-majestation, this Chushingura-worthy
objurgation that only nine Earthlings speak Latin. The insult and
the non-inclusion festered in my Latin-speaking mind so much that
I decided three days ago to show them that not only are there
more than nine Latin-speakers, but that even imbecile Windoze
machines can speak and think in Latin. And once I launched the
Latin AI project, I discovered that the fun and excitement of it
all grew on me and sucked me in stronger and stronger -- citius,
altius, fortius. Sure, it's just a hobby, but it's better than
fiddling while Notre Dame burns.
For my first release of the Mens Latina three nights ago, I
simply did a mutatis mutandis of changing the interface of my
previous AI from English into Latin, and I changed the links at
the top from English links into Latin links. Then I ran it up the
Internet flagpole to see if anybody would salute it, but nobody did.
For my second release I actually inserted some Latin concepts
into the MindBoot sequence, but I had a terrible time trying to
figure out a new name for the English word "MindBoot". At first I
was going to call it the OmniScium as if it knew everything, but
then I settled on PraeScium as the sequence of innate prior
knowledge that gets the AI up and running. I did some more
mutatis of the mutandis by changing the names of the main
thinking modules from English into Latin. But when I ran the AI,
it reduplicated the final word of its only innate idea and it
said "EGO SUM PERSONA PERSONA". Today for a third release we need
to troubleshoot the problem.
For the third release we have added one more innate idea, "TU ES
HOMO" for "You are a human being." We put some temporary
activation on the pronoun "TU" so that the Latin AI would find
the activated idea and speak it. Unfortunately, the AI says "TU
ES HOMO HOMO". Something is still causing reduplication.
Into the "PraeScium" MindBoot section we added the words "QUID"
for "what" and "EST" for "is", so that the SpreadAct module could
ask a question about any new, unknown word. We mutandied the
necessary mutatis in SpreadAct and we began to see some actual
thinking in Latin, some conversation between Robo Sapiens and
Homo Sapiens. We entered the word "terra" and the AI said, "QUID
EST TERRA". We answered "TERRA EST RES" and the AI asked us,
"QUID EST RES". It is now possible to ask the AI "quid sum ego"
but, to quote Vergil, responsa non dabantur fida satis.
Mentis versio Abra003A in die Sat Apr 20 08:26:34 PDT 2019
Robo Sapiens: TU ES HOMO HOMO
Homo Sapiens: terra
Robo Sapiens: QUID EST TERRA
Homo Sapiens: terra est res
Robo Sapiens: QUID EST RES
Homo Sapiens:
Robo Sapiens:
Homo Sapiens: quid sum ego
Robo Sapiens: TU ES HOMO HOMO ES HOMO HOMO
Homo Sapiens:
--
http://ai.neocities.org/Abracadabra.html
http://medium.com/p/237437640203
*Artificial General Intelligence List
<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* / AGI / see discussions
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9baf73b813714625-M820303d01a0245b56311eb3d>
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9baf73b813714625-Ma0d43dbf06cac25739f8eb7c
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
