I have coded in 30+ languages from ASM to C++. I have coded in Perl for
20+ years. I have hacked thousands of websites, hundreds of computer
games and reverse engineered even more. I have won several programming
and hacking challenges. I have worked as a system engineer, software
engineer, ethical hacker, malware analyst, etc., etc., etc., .... that's
"what i got" and I tell you that his code does nothing at all. It does
not tackle anything ... not even TIC TAC TOE.
Bringing up a theoretical concept like AIXI shows how little you understand.
He made no attempt. He creates nonsensical horse shit. In his crazy mind
it might be an attempt but it isn't. As stated before ... if you argue
that 15000 lines of horse shit are just "too complex" for us to
understand then you are just as crazy as him ... and I believe you to be
his alter ego anyway because you always post after him and defend him.
This has been going on for ages ...
I don't work on AGI ... I communicate the need for cooperative monetary
systems, degrowth, a #basicincome, obsoleting the work-for-income
paradigm and 4 billion #bullshitjobs so we have enough time to actually
come up with AGI before our society and biosphere collapse. I deem this
to be as important as AGI ... and if AGI turns out to take another 100
years to crack I still want to have an inhabitable planet. That's what I
do and your penis might be waaaaaaay longer than mine ... you still
don't understand Perl code nor AGI for shit.
On 21/04/2019 00:20, MP via AGI wrote:
Well hold on now, I never claimed to think his code is AGI. What I
admire about it is that it's one of the few attempts at solving it - a
real, honest, genuine attempt at the grand challenge. It's not some
elusive corporate thing we'd never see the source code or even
programs from; It's at least *something*
What about things like the Godel Machine and AIXI? Are you going to
shit on them too because the math is too hard for you to understand?
What about kurzweil's pattern recognition theory of mind?
Dianetics?
How about SOAR or ACT-R? What's wrong, lisp got your tongue?
And you have the Nigel AGI, Novamente, and a host of other claims that
are nothing more than baseless hype with no substance behind them. Yet
you won't make any fuss about that because they've given you concepts
easy enough for a small minded individual like yourself to digest and
make you feel smart about the illusion of knowing how the mind works.
My point is that he's made an attempt. Maybe not a good one, maybe not
even a functional one, but he's at least one of the few people to
actively work on it.
Again, what do you have to show?
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Apr 20, 2019, 5:12 PM, justcamel < [email protected]> wrote:
Don't get me wrong ... I love you as a human being ... I see you
as my human brother and love you with all of my heart ... but you
are fucking stupid for even arguing. I could shit on my keyboard
and have the keystrokes converted into random compiling Perl code
and you would argue that it's potential AGI ... that's how
horrible you seem to be at understanding Perl and AGI.
On 21/04/2019 00:08, MP via AGI wrote:
Have you even tried to read his code for yourself and tried to
understand it?
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Apr 20, 2019, 5:06 PM, justcamel < [email protected]> wrote:
Do you even realize how stupid it is to defend a spammer with
a code that consists of 15.000 nonsensical lines ... who now
writes 3 pages about this nonsensical concept of "Latin AI"
... like intelligence has anything to do with Russian,
English or Latin ... like you tackle AGI by switching from
Russian to Latin ... and by hardcoding 100 random words via
global arrays ... and again ... his code does N O T H I N G.
If you don't understand this then maybe read some mailing
list you actually understand and don't defend spam that has
been going on for decades ...
On 20/04/2019 23:51, MP via AGI wrote:
Hey, at least he's doing something with his life. Where's
any work of yours you spent decades on? Even if he's
completely wrong - which I'm sure he is - at least he has
something he can claim as his life's work.
I don't appreciate anyone here belittling him, honestly.
Yes, I know, it's mostly ramblings, but again, he's at least
trying to tackle the grand challenge. What do any of his
attackers have instead? Absolutely nothing.
This toxic behavior against him is disgusting.
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Apr 20, 2019, 4:47 PM, justcamel < [email protected]>
wrote:
Amazing that one brain can be so full of nonsense and
still allow the human to operate in this world ...
On 20/04/2019 23:24, A.T. Murray wrote:
Three days ago on impulse we began coding a Latin AI
Mind in JavaScript for MSIE. We used JavaScript for the
sake of what culture snobs call "accessability". In art
or in culture, if a work is "accessable", it means that
even hoi polloi can appreciate it. We classicists of
ancient Greek and Latin are extremely snobby, exceeded
in this regard perhaps only by the Egyptologists and by
those who know Sanskrit. In fact, our local university
newspaper had an article a few weeks ago claiming that
there are five million modern speakers of Sanskrit and
only nine individual speakers worldwide who speak Latin
as a second language. Immediately I took offense
because they obviously did not include memetipsum among
the precious nine speakers of Latin. On the Internet I
tried to hunt down the source of this allegation, this
lese-majestation, this Chushingura-worthy objurgation
that only nine Earthlings speak Latin. The insult and
the non-inclusion festered in my Latin-speaking mind so
much that I decided three days ago to show them that
not only are there more than nine Latin-speakers, but
that even imbecile Windoze machines can speak and think
in Latin. And once I launched the Latin AI project, I
discovered that the fun and excitement of it all grew
on me and sucked me in stronger and stronger -- citius,
altius, fortius. Sure, it's just a hobby, but it's
better than fiddling while Notre Dame burns.
For my first release of the Mens Latina three nights
ago, I simply did a mutatis mutandis of changing the
interface of my previous AI from English into Latin,
and I changed the links at the top from English links
into Latin links. Then I ran it up the Internet
flagpole to see if anybody would salute it, but nobody did.
For my second release I actually inserted some Latin
concepts into the MindBoot sequence, but I had a
terrible time trying to figure out a new name for the
English word "MindBoot". At first I was going to call
it the OmniScium as if it knew everything, but then I
settled on PraeScium as the sequence of innate prior
knowledge that gets the AI up and running. I did some
more mutatis of the mutandis by changing the names of
the main thinking modules from English into Latin. But
when I ran the AI, it reduplicated the final word of
its only innate idea and it said "EGO SUM PERSONA
PERSONA". Today for a third release we need to
troubleshoot the problem.
For the third release we have added one more innate
idea, "TU ES HOMO" for "You are a human being." We put
some temporary activation on the pronoun "TU" so that
the Latin AI would find the activated idea and speak
it. Unfortunately, the AI says "TU ES HOMO HOMO".
Something is still causing reduplication.
Into the "PraeScium" MindBoot section we added the
words "QUID" for "what" and "EST" for "is", so that the
SpreadAct module could ask a question about any new,
unknown word. We mutandied the necessary mutatis in
SpreadAct and we began to see some actual thinking in
Latin, some conversation between Robo Sapiens and Homo
Sapiens. We entered the word "terra" and the AI said,
"QUID EST TERRA". We answered "TERRA EST RES" and the
AI asked us, "QUID EST RES". It is now possible to ask
the AI "quid sum ego" but, to quote Vergil, responsa
non dabantur fida satis.
Mentis versio Abra003A in die Sat Apr 20 08:26:34 PDT 2019
Robo Sapiens: TU ES HOMO HOMO
Homo Sapiens: terra
Robo Sapiens: QUID EST TERRA
Homo Sapiens: terra est res
Robo Sapiens: QUID EST RES
Homo Sapiens:
Robo Sapiens:
Homo Sapiens: quid sum ego
Robo Sapiens: TU ES HOMO HOMO ES HOMO HOMO
Homo Sapiens:
--
http://ai.neocities.org/Abracadabra.html
http://medium.com/p/237437640203
*Artificial General Intelligence List
<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* / AGI / see discussions
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9baf73b813714625-Mc6c890db612c2340cbf7aa61>
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9baf73b813714625-Mc5ce7891701493b866b68123
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
