On 2019-11-08 15:58:PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
You can choose to model I/O peripherals as either part of the agent or part of the environment. Likewise for an input delay line. In one case it lowers intelligence and in the other case it doesn't.
Thinking about it in computer science terms blurs the issue, because there you can model everything as signal processing, and the agent-environment distinction can become more murky. Definitions of intelligence should also apply to biological systems. The distinction between agent and environment can get a bit blurry there as well, what with the "extended phenotype", but eyes, ears, and muscles are normally part of the agent, not part of the environment. I don't think it can coherently be argued that Legg and Hutter intended to exclude sensory / motor systems from their definition on the grounds that those were part of the environment. -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ [email protected] 617-671-9930 ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6cada473e1abac06-M4f1a14bcbce2577d0f70a8f5 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
