I skimmed but did not yet read that patent application. However it doesn't appear to address the formal gap between Laws of Form logic and Link-Theory / Quantum-Logic in any direct-ish way, does it?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:08 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:44 PM Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ...But there is a formal gap between Laws of Form logic and Link-Theory / >> Quantum-Logic, which probably can be filled but I am doing too much >> other stuff to think about it hard at the moment. That's why I'm >> probing to see if you have some insight or reference that may fill >> this gap, as you're one of the few folks I know who have dug into >> these various areas apparently fairly deeply... > > > If I had it to do over again, I would have hired Manthey rather than Etter. > See: > > https://patents.google.com/patent/US20160148110A1/en > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants + > delivery options Permalink -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org “Words exist because of meaning; once you've got the meaning you can forget the words. How can we build an AGI who will forget words so I can have a word with him?” -- Zhuangzhi++ ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T425c68f0cea319cd-M303bf706c5aa758bfe9bf588 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
