On Tuesday, May 04, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Mike Archbold wrote:
> There isn't, to my knowledge, a working AGI,
so it seems difficult to cite anybody as a "real AI researcher" on the
grounds of producing a working AGI. What's left to resort to? Well,
the researcher's methods along with a *subjective*, gut feel as far as
whether the proposed architecture might eventually yield AGI-ish
How good it Predicts. Equivalent to how good it Losslessly Compresses. AGI
needs to *generate new* solutions, see openAI.com to see what prediction looks
like. LC tests for you this.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7c7052974ce450f1-M70e72115ba2c8f1c7b45b4af
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
