On Tuesday, May 04, 2021, at 11:31 AM, Mike Archbold wrote: > Colin's methods are first and foremost scientific. You can't fault that. The scientific methods by which Colin hopes to test his claims remain pretty cloudy to me.
He has a proposed hardware device/architecture, which he believes does a better job of emulating brain physics than a traditional digital computer. But I don't know what algorithm he is going to run on it. And I can't remember seeing him hypothesize a *mechanism* by which the unique physics of his device will affect the output, or even describing (in specifics) how he expects the output to differ from the output a digital computer would produce when running the same algorithm. So what falsifiable assumption is he subjecting to experiment? ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7c7052974ce450f1-M5e114a9dfe886242f1e187d9 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
