On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 3:33 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

> And what about this Matt ?? >>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/51391518506/
>

What about it? You can extrapolate the graph to see Cerebras is a few years
away from building it. The Business Wire article just repeats the same
press release.

That's assuming they can raise funding AND Moore's law continues. But you
might have noticed that computer clock speeds stalled around 2010 and
transistor sizes are stalling now. You can't distinguish between P and N
type silicon below a few nanometers.

The problem with sparse matrices is that any representation using pointers
requires random memory access, which is 100 times slower than sequential
access because address decoding is O(log n) in memory size. All this extra
logic produces heat, which is the main reason we don't use wafer scale
integration. Repairing manufacturing defects isn't the problem.

Once we finalize the optimization of existing hardware over the next
decade, the only way to solve the power problem is the way our bodies do
it, by moving heavy, slow atoms and molecules instead of electrons.
Biotechnology is advancing rapidly but it will be a few decades before it
catches up to our stalled transistor technology.

Google will probably buy Cerebras for cheap and build their own system.


------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T607f92b6c1ea30a8-Mad0e13fb1701d9241c120ab9
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to