On Sunday, August 13, 2023, at 4:29 AM, immortal.discoveries wrote: > Yes it's true, an exact clone of me would be exactly me, yet, due to my silly > human nature that I truly yes "believe" and "abide by" (yes, I do), I believe > I am a viewer of the senses that pass through my eyes/brain, and that me the > viewer wants to stay alive, and that a clone of me fails to be me or transfer > me. >
A clone would have a different K complexity than you therefore it's not you. If the clone was a fully you it would need to contain universal circumstances which it does not since IMO the K explodes therefore it's inconsistent thus invalidating certain perspectives. Uniqueness is in the eye of the perceiver. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T772759d8ceb4b92c-M64080c304843360dc168949e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
