On Sat, Aug 12, 2023, 4:14 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

> @Matt
> Until you can explain how wealthy people would suicide, I don't understand
> how that works.
>

I am sure you are aware of millionaire celebrities who seem to have
everything and then die young from suicidal behavior like drug overdoses.

Achieving goals depends on knowledge and computing power, the things we
measure with IQ and academic tests like memory size, learning rate, and
reasoning speed. But your goals, like food, sex, social status, and
avoiding the things that can kill you, are not the goals of evolution. The
goal of evolution is to reproduce as fast as possible. It takes fewer
resources to design animals that fear death for long enough to reproduce
and then die.

You are born fearing pain, heights, large animals, and spiders. You have
illusions of consciousness, qualia, and free will conditioned by positive
reinforcement of computation, input, and output respectively, so you want
to preserve them by not dying. You have an illusion of identity, which says
that copies of you (your children who inherit your knowledge) are not you,
that you are more than your memories. If I presented you with a robot that
looks and acts like you, would you shoot yourself to complete the upload?
Or would your evolved beliefs stop you?

But to answer your question, high IQ people are better at achieving their
goals, even if it's suicide. We were smart enough to invent birth control.
Smart people (by our definition, not evolution's) can increase their wealth
by not having children. Smart people, unlike children and animals, realize
they will eventually die and can invent rational reasons to take control of
dying and achieve that goal. There were mass suicides in Germany after
Hitler killed himself because people believed their fates would be worse
under occupation. Suicide rates in the US are higher in states with high
rates of gun ownership because other methods usually fail.

But maybe the gal is.....escape velocity for immortality?

It won't happen in our lifetimes. The cost of medical care is rising
exponentially, just like the cost of computation is falling exponentially.
Eroom's law (Moore spelled backwards), says that the cost of new drugs
doubles every 9 years. Coincidentally, this is the same rate as your death
probability past age 30. The result is a constant rate of life expectancy
increase of 0.2 over the last century.

Wouldn't 3 parents be better?

Hundreds would be even better. That's what we effectively got when we
evolved language, allowing us to organize into tribes and villages with
government and an economy where people could cooperate and specialize in
farming, teaching, or defence.

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T772759d8ceb4b92c-M1f0d4352a7b0a7eabd155996
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to