Dorian,

Look again at those graphs. Action potentials come and go in
sub-millisecond times, yet those "spikes" are tens of milliseconds long.
Either there is something wrong with the apparatus (I always used coaxial
"driven shields" to eliminate the effects of capacitance, etc), or there
are LOTS of neurons involved in making those slow "spikes".

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Dorian Aur <[email protected]> wrote:

> The signal from every   "antenna" can be used to see what happens inside
> the cell during action potential generation (1ms) in vivo, see the papers,
> http://neuroelectrodynamics.blogspot.com/p/spike-directivity.html


Note that most people expect 1/r^2 dropoff with distance, but with long
neurons, the dropoff is only 1/r. Worse yet, if you haven't well grounded
things so that dropoff can happen (and the "floating" nature of the curve
literally screams of bad grounding), there is NO dropoff at all with
distance - you see everything there is to see, all superimposed, like in an
EEG. Indeed, note the similarity in appearance with an EEG.


> With  single electrodes in vitro,the phenomenon cannot be observed
>

Thereby proving that it doesn't exist.

Anyway, our discussion here illustrates the sorts of disagreements that so
often exist when neuroscience meets computer science. It takes scrupulous
attention to details to be able to capture things you can really believe,
and there are SO many subtle indications of things that aren't really
happening.

Speculation on inadequate evidence is GOOD, because without it the field
could not advance. However, be careful not to become too invested in your
speculations. To illustrate, I first "proved" that at least some neurons
communicate the logarithms of probabilities of assertions being true, only
to decades later show that more likely those same neurons are communicating
the derivatives of the logarithms of probabilities being true.

In this business there is very little that can be proved, only disproved,
and then only under certain particular circumstances.

Steve
================

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Steve Richfield <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dorian,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dorian Aur <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Excellent topic. During every action potential every neuron *solves* an
>>> n-body problem analog ‘doing’/ execution and the  information is
>>> electrically carried and integrated in the brain
>>> http://neuroelectrodynamics.blogspot.com/p/spike-directivity.html  *The
>>> fundamental process of computation by physical interaction in the brain has
>>> been widely misunderstood*.
>>>
>>
>> I think the thesis of this site is misdirected. extracellular recording
>> involves using a sort of "antenna" that collects not only the cell you are
>> near, but also other nearby cells all added together. Hence, OF COURSE you
>> will see apparent modulation, even when it isn't actually there.
>>
>> There has been most of a century of intracellular recording, where they
>> impale a neuron with an electrode and look at what is happening inside the
>> cell. Those experiments have observed NO such modulation.
>>
>> It appears that the value being transmitted is a function of the
>> separation between spikes. This is NOT linear, and closely placed spikes
>> count as MUCH more than isolated spikes.
>>
>> However, information travels BOTH ways on axons, and there may even be
>> more than one "forward channel" as ions travel both ways along axons.
>>
>> However, only a tiny percentage of neurons, mostly ones with really long
>> axons (often long enough to see even without a microscope) to transmit
>> their information to a distant place, even produce spikes. The vast
>> majority of neurons simply vary their potential as they "compute", all
>> without producing any spikes.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/17795807-366cfa2a> |
>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>
>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac> |
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-- 
Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six
hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full
employment.



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to