I guess they could be simulated on a two dimensional network, but you know what I was trying to say.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > Well my dismissal of parallel systems might have been a little > exaggerated. Almost all of us believe that AGI has to be based on some > kind of network, and it does seem like parallelism could be put to good use > for distributed networks. However, the problem is that these systems > cannot be dependent on flat networks or simplistic three-dimensional > networks and it is because of the possible complications of > multi-dimensional systems (which might be represented by complex potential > for interrelationships on a three dimensional network) which means that the > more complicated cases could and probably would gum up the potential > advantage of using parallel systems. (The advantage would only be low > polynomial for the near future.) > > Jim Bromer > > >> >> >> <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
