Ben,
However, your approach seems very simple. So, if it's so simple and
it's workable, then why doesn't it work yet? You're a very smart guy
and have been working on it a while... ;p
That's what you do when you can't argue theoretically: "Show me the money!"
I am trying to explain why your "complex" problems are actually very simple.
That doesn't mean I don't have problems, but how am I supposed to explain
them to you, when you don't even get my solutions?
I think it does, - you measure complexity as data + syntax, & simplicity
as
a difference between initial & compressed complexity.
Yes, but you are making a choice about what language to use in the role
of "syntax", and what language to use to express compressed entities..
Once again, I don't choose "language". I define operations: comparison &
evaluation, which generate incremental syntax. Those aren't necessarily
simple. I think I got comparison, though I may have to keep extending it.
Reasonably complete evaluation is a lot trickier, that's what I am working
on now. Would be glad to discuss that, but will probably lose you right
away.
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
