> Our internal semantic representation has nothing in common with the link > parser representation either: > > http://wiki.opencog.org/w/OpenCogAtomTypes > > Pretty much, I suppose if you don't like this sort of representation, then > you won't want to do your project in OpenCog...
And see here http://wiki.opencog.org/w/WordNode for the way linguistic content is currently represented, though many of these details will be changed/augmented as a result of Ruiting's work in the next months... -- Ben ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
