This isn't designed to produce a real world embedded language user, is it?
S.o. who can go into the world and sit on a "chair", "pick up" a "box",
"move" this over "there", is it? S.o. who *understands* language and "knows
what they're talking about" ?
Why is this any different from, or superior to, NLP?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Goertzel
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:15 AM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Finding the "Right" Computational Model to Support
Occam's Razor
Our internal semantic representation has nothing in common with the link
parser representation either:
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/OpenCogAtomTypes
Pretty much, I suppose if you don't like this sort of representation, then
you won't want to do your project in OpenCog...
And see here
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/WordNode
for the way linguistic content is currently represented, though many of
these
details will be changed/augmented as a result of Ruiting's work in the next
months...
-- Ben
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
