Next you will ask me to define math. Then define define. Those words are
symbols. Without them this is what you get:  "                   "

Do you see anything there? It is the absence of symbols. That too has
meaning and meaning plus meaning + meaning + meaning is the same as lots of
meaning, meaning + meaning =  meaning... but the absence of symbols
indicates nothing equals nada = zippo = 0.

Are you understanding this?  "This" in your mind at this moment not over
there, here, now, less than later,  < later ... > now, greater than, > than,
>> now = much later.

Should I continue? No? Not? 0=NO. 1=YES. Maybe? Maybeeee many times, 10 x
maybe = maybe maybe maybe maybe...same as very possibly.

Use your imagination :)

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tintner [mailto:[email protected]]
> 
> Ok. "That's just the way  it is" is your example.
> 
> Now you have to explain how it is mathematical - and you have to relate it
to
> mathematical symbology or figures - the actual stuff of maths - not
concepts
> or ideas which are merely about, and not intrinsic to, maths.
> 
> We'll wait for your answer - and you won't be able to show any
relationship
> of your example to maths.
> 
> "Way" for example is a physical concept - but "in no way" is it
mathematical.
> 
> This BTW is important.  Conceptual thought is the stuff of AGI - and it is
> precisely what maths can't handle. Maths has been a total failure in terms
of
> AGI.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G. Rose
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:43 PM
> To: AGI
> Subject: RE: [agi] How Steve can be creative (or: The Nature of
> Intelligence/AGI)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tintner [mailto:[email protected]]
> >
> > You've just stated* that I am forming a math. model - and given not
> > the slightest reason or evidence, other than "that's just the way  it
is."
> >
> > I gave you examples of general/ conceptual thought -  none of them are
> > mathematical. Mathematical thought is in fact demonstrably the
> > opposite of conceptual  thought -  "specific general" vs "general
> > general" (truly general).  Maths is always tied to specifics.
> > Conceptual thought is on the contrary always vague.
> >
> > None of you can (or will ) give any examples of a mathematical concept.
> > Boris merely exploded when challenged. You have retreated into fantasy.
> >
> > In real world reasoning, John - you reason from the *evidence* and
> > produce examples. Try it sometime.
> >
> >
> 
> That's the example -> "That's just the way it is." Both specific and
general. I
> offer that structure from my mind to your mind. It is symbols and action.
You
> deconstruct/construct. It has handles in your memory that start
connections
> to other actions and memories in your mind. It's a meme and a teme
> (Blackmore). It is Symbols and Operations. It is a mathematical structure
> operated on mathematically by your mind even though your mind readily
> denies it as anti-mathematter.. :)
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-
> 59a2eca5
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-
> d0d678e2
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> e08df8db
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to