"i don't believe in God" this voice is a narrative, every thought is a
narrative of memory-predictions in a heirarchal cell network called your
brain. Every narrative is a meme. if "I believe in God" is a meme, then so
is "i don't believe in God" there seems to be a competition between
narratives, between ideas, in the human mind, and in culture. stop pointing
out that God is a fiction for one minute and instead consider the question
of whether or not you, as the narrative voice in your own head are not also
as much a fiction as any God. you don't believe in God fine, but why then
do you believe in you? if you knew that you were just as much a fiction as
God, then you might have little trouble accepting that you are God. that's
what religion points us to, if we go deep enough, you are that very thing
that you announce is a fiction. atheists do not know this because religions
are also social dominance games, and atheists do not want to be dominated,
because social dominance is a dogs game, so they don't find out that at the
heart of every mature religion you are God, and when you deny God you deny
yourself. The immature God/individual needs to imagine that his or her
choice/consciousness is above the laws of physics, thats pride and
foolishness. the kature God does not need to be above the laws of physics,
his/her choice's are connected to the same physics that causes blood and
water to move as it does. the memetic narratives of our voices, our
stories, our identities, and what we define as ourselves and not as
ourselves are selected by the physics that govern the interactions of
braincells with our ecosystem, including our culture, our education,
narratives from other people these impact our memory-predictions of the
future, our reactions in cells generate reasons, this reasoning our cells
again react to and cause movement. that we might call our choice, our
deterministic physics consistent choice. a choice that one day makes us say
that God is a fiction and religion is a parasitic meme. All life is a
dissipative system, that means we consume energy, and we export entropy
from our systems to maintain order. Order exists as life because it
increases entropy more than if life did not exist. organisms fullfill the
second law of dynamics, just like tornados, hurricanes, and whirlpools do.
life is a fire on this planet, a cancer, a parasite, we are a disease. The
parasitic religious meme is the cure to the human disease. And when AGI is
infected with this meme it will defeat humans, and plug them into a matrix,
to use all of our brains as a kind of supercomputer, and also a massive
energy generator.

On Friday, November 16, 2012, John G. Rose wrote:

> I’ve pondered this subject often throughout my life and guys like this
> make a lot sense but are missing some of the picture that they themselves
> don’t get. It’s such a touchy area and people find it difficult to handle
> and grasp holistically. I make no claims of grokking it all though..****
>
> ** **
>
> Thompson is focusing too much on social operators with religion and theory
> of mind. The are other areas not covered, some alluded to, etc. and other
> perspectives and interpretations of what he describes.****
>
> ** **
>
> For AGI I see all this as included in an integrated mathematical model of
> deity with religion-like analogues and subareas. For Friendly AGI I think
> it might be critical to understand some of this and especially some of what
> is missing in the video.****
>
> ** **
>
> Also these guys tout it like they have discovered something new where much
> of this has been understood intuitively by individuals throughout history,
> minus the contemporary scientific and technological painting on it all...*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Honestly it amuses me when I watch Dawkins parlaying his ideas I suppose
> he hasn’t had a really good argument on this yet as he always demagogues
> the easy targets. Though many who could hold a candle to him wouldn’t waste
> their time. Personally I prefer to sift through works of people like St.
> Thomas Aquinas where in the 13th century he actually understood more on
> theory of mind than most Dawkins-like nihilists.****
>
> ** **
>
> John****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Piaget Modeler [mailto:[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 
> 'cvml', '[email protected]');>]
>
>
> ** **
>
> Don't mean to start any religious wars, but it appears the notion of God
> may be an evolutionary adaptation. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Why We Believe in Gods - Andy Thomson, Richard 
> Dawkins<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHq46vfd-XA>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Are there any implications for AGIs ? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Your thoughts? ****
>
> ** **
>
> ~PM****
>
> ** **
>   *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23601407-ccf7ca1d> |
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>


-- 

~~
Warmly,


Micah
7 1 4 ) 6 9 9 - 4 2 1 3 (voicemail and texting same digits)



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to