* relativity
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Ian W Eberhart <[email protected]>wrote: > I don't think occam's razor is just the "shortest" explanation, but the > one that requires the least complexity. From what I understand, the two > theories provided here are working within the same level of complexity; > they are working from the same data. > > If you were to extrapolate on the "shortest" explanation definition, you > could say that occam's razor was disproved long ago when general relatively > was able to predict celestial movement with more precision than classical > mechanics. > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
