There are situations where applying Occam's razor always works and
situations where applying Occam's razor never works. It's a general rule
across a variety just like other things...

 

John

 

From: Ian W Eberhart [mailto:[email protected]] 



 

I don't think occam's razor is just the "shortest" explanation, but the one
that requires the least complexity.  From what I understand, the two
theories provided here are working within the same level of complexity; they
are working from the same data.

If you were to extrapolate on the "shortest" explanation definition, you
could say that occam's razor was disproved long ago when general relatively
was able to predict celestial movement with more precision than  classical
mechanics. 




-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to