Hey Jim,
If you replace all your references to God with a G(x) or say a G(od) that would at least get some of these people thinking (with the exception maybe of Tintner). They can't grasp what God is mathematically as they dwell on the existence of a proof of God's existence not God as a mathematical expression of what his existence means to us and AGI better have some idea of what God is otherwise it'll think we're all p-zombies... and that might not go so well. hint hint... John From: Jim Bromer [mailto:[email protected]] The theoretical objects are: 1. God 2. Me, inspired by God according to my conjecture. 3. A computer program that I would be able to write if I had/have been. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
