> Feedback from what? It is well known that you can't parse a sentence > unless you understand it first.
`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe; All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe. ... Colorless green ideas sleep furiously, my friend !!! >Since the semantics is the output, I > don't understand why the parser is at the front, or why you even need > it at all. If we didn't use an explicit parser of some sort, we could use a logic engine or a neural net acting as a parser. Or, with a lot more effort, make a system that learns from experience how to map syntax to semantics, and in doing so, creates something similar to a parser within itself... I don't think the human brain achieves language understanding via anything resembling simple Markov analysis. I believe there's something vaguely like a parser in there.... I'm aware the neuroscience jury is still out on this one... -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
