I have made an important discovery so I probably won't be working on the AGi program that I had thought I was going to work on this year. Does this mean that I did not have it totally figured out? Yes it does. I do not have it totally figured out. However, my discovery has broader implications and I feel that I have a responsibility to try this new idea out. Furthermore, if it works, I believe it will be a major step closer to true AGI. My discovery is an AGi database annotation language. I should be able to use it to teach the program to use a rudimentary human language but it will be easier to use the annotation language to create a more intelligent kind of database. The annotation language is an artificial language which will allow me to encode almost any AGi relation that I choose into a database. If I follow through and succeed with this plan I will only be developing it to use with text for now. But my discovery has broader implications because it represents a new field of computational mathematics (or at least it will represent a significant integration of scattered exsisting concepts and novel concepts that I have thought of.) The only reason why it would not represent an actual AGi program is that the programming language is very artificial (and obviously so) and I won't be fully developing the trial and error learning which is a significant part of AGi. However, if this experiment works it should provide me with some insights into what is needed to make a true AGi program. Jim Bromer
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
