I would say concurrent.  Perhaps it is not good to think either/or, or
sequence.   But if you have to think in discrete terms, go Occam's
razor.  Think of a term that could stand on its own.

On 9/13/14, Piaget Modeler via AGI <[email protected]> wrote:
> Importance then urgency, or urgency then importance?
> Which?
>
> ~PM                                   
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to